401k Planning

New 401k Features to Watch For

401k’s have taken a lot of heat recently. The 2008 market meltdown spoiled retirement plans for millions of baby-boomers nearing retirement. Not only did 401k market values tumble an estimated $2 trillion, but scores of companies stopped matching employee contributions altogether. Time Magazine’s October 8, 2009 cover story even declared that it was “time to retire the 401(k)”.

But rumors of the 401k’s demise are premature. Despite many shortcomings, 401k’s will almost certainly remain the primary retirement program for US workers for decades to come. Cost-conscious companies are not about to get back into the defined benefit pension business. The federal government is in no position to take on retirement funding responsibilities beyond social security and medicare. And state and local governments, buckling under the weight of their own overly-rich DB pensions, may be the next big growth area for 401k-type retirement programs.

So if 401k’s aren’t going away, it makes sense to see what the next generation of 401k’s might look like. Here’s a brief look at some new 401k features to watch out for:

  1. Auto-401k – Continued emphasis on automatically enrolling employees in company 401k’s and automatically defaulting employees into pre-selected investment funds. This movement is well underway and is strongly endorsed in federal legislation and supported by powerful interests like AARP. More focus will be placed on auto-enrolling all employees, not just new hires.
  2. Auto-Contribution Escalation – More 401k programs will automatically step-up employee 401k contribution rates (e.g. 1% per year) until maximum threshold (e.g. 10% of pay) is reached. As with auto-enrollment, increases would occur by default and need to be specifically overridden by the employee.
  3. Investment Options – Look for: 1) movement away from actively managed funds to lower-cost index funds, 2) greater use of “managed accounts” where an investment adviser places participants into a pre-mixed portfolio of funds based on factors like age, expected date of retirement, and risk tolerance, 3) more focus on maintaining low investment management and transaction fees and, 4) automatic re-balancing of investment portfolios.
  4. Personalized Financial Advice – Online tools as well as face-to-face financial advice will cover broader spectrum of personal finance issues not limited to 401k investments.
  5. Reporting & Disclosure – Pending legislation would require plan sponsors to provide clear and understandable fee disclosures on 401k investment options. Another recent piece of legislation would require sponsors to inform participating workers of the projected monthly income they could expect at retirement based on their current 401k account balance. The buzzword these days is transparency and 401k’s will include more reporting and disclosure to try and ensure that participants are fully informed about their retirement program.
  6. More and Better Annuities – Unlike traditional pensions that pay a monthly benefit for life, 401k’s benefits last only until the account balance is depleted. Indeed, one of the shortcomings of 401k’s is that far too many participants take money out in a lump sum instead of planning for a steady benefit distribution. Look for a variety of annuity-based 401k withdrawal options in the future.
  7. Retention of Participants Post-Retirement – Upon reaching retirement age, the norm has been for participants to take a lump-sum withdrawal from their 401k and roll it over to an IRA. Plan sponsors are realizing that this detracts from the plans asset base, increasing fees and lowering buying power. Participants are realizing IRA investments have higher fees and lack the fiduciary oversight and advice tools available in an employer’s 401k. Look for greater emphasis on retaining 401k participants into retirement.

Comments

5 Responses to “New 401k Features to Watch For”
  1. Julie Henry says:

    I recently started a new job and unbeknownst to me was automatically enrolled in the company 401K with 3% of my income being diverted into the plan without my picking the funds. When I tried to opt out of the program, as I would rather handle my own money, thank you, I found it almost impossible to do so. The managing company had set the enrollment process up so that it was not user friendly and would take almost an hour of time on the phone with an automated system or internet access with special instructions not provided on the site to get out of it. You did not simply have the option not to participate. You enrolled and had to choose 0% of deductions and then choose a fund to place 100% of those $0 into.
    When I finally reached a customer service rep from that company, I was told that it is federal law now to be automatically enrolled in a company’s 401K.
    My question is, is that true and if so, do you know a bill name and number so that I can read it? Your article above aludes to “federal legislation strongly endorsed’ auto-enrollment. I just want to know when it was passed and what the actual legislation is.
    Thanks for any assistance.

  2. admin says:

    Automatic enrollment for 401k’s was greatly enabled by the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the text of which can be found at the Department of Labor website (http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pensionreform.html). You may also want to check out the http://www.RetirementMadeSimpler.org website for more information about automatic enrollment.

  3. me says:

    I do not believe in the government-controlled 401k plan. I currently invest 8% of my salary into a 401K plan with an employer match for that amount. The government is trying to pass legislation to take our money from the 401K and use it for “social security”. I hope this doesn’t happen; they will only give us a 3% return on our money, not even enough to keep up with inflation.

  4. Paul in DC says:

    “Me Says”
    There is no plan to divert workers’ 401(K) money to Social Security. I don’t know where you go that idea. I think Wall Street would not want any competition stealing our 401(K) money, since they control this town, it wouldn’t happen.

    P.

  5. Gary F. says:

    Why are distributions from my 2009 401(k) contributions for IRS compliance which “place limits on the percentage that highly compensated employees can contribute to a 401(k) Plan as compared to non-highly compensated employees”. What decides who is and is not “highly compensated”. How much is “higly compensated”? What is the IRS rule paragraph reference?
    Gary F.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...

401k Planning